|
A Summary of NRC's Interim Radiological
Cleanup Criteria and Current Dose Bases
Decommissioning and Regulatory Issues Branch, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission November 1992
Implementation of residual contamination criteria is dependent
on the establishment of acceptable dose or risk criteria for unrestricted use
of nuclear facilities. The NRC has been using a patchwork of remediation
criteria to define acceptable levels for cleanup of radioactive contamination.
However, these criteria are not currently binding on licensees and are
generally not consistent with one another or with comparable requirements being
established and imposed by other agencies (e.g., Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA)). In addition, the scientific basis for some of the criteria
established in the 1970s and early 1980s is out of date. Further, some of the
criteria are only indirectly related to the protection of the public health and
safety and the environment.
In the mid-1980s, NRC staff initiated development of the
technical basis to support a rulemaking to codify final cleanup standards for
radiological contamination. This rulemaking was an outgrowth of the NRC's
long-term effort to establish decommissioning requirements (53 FR 24018; June
27, 1988). However, the rulemaking to establish radiological criteria for
decommissioning may not be completed for another two years or so, posing the
problem of what criteria should the NRC use in the interim to determine whether
sites have been sufficiently decontaminated so that they may be released for
unrestricted use.
In preparing this paper, the NRC staff identified the full range
of existing cleanup criteria used by the NRC and estimated the doses associated
with the criteria.
[NOTE : The NRC rule establishing radiological criteria for
decommissioning was finalized July 21, 1997. Referred to as the License
Termination Rule (LTR) [62 FR 39058-39092], these regulations specifically
exclude the FUSRAP uranium mill tailings. A subsequent Uranium Recovery
Facilities Rule also is not applicable to these wastes, see
F.A.C.T.S.' letter to NRC Chairman Jackson.
Therefore, the following NRC and EPA criteria constitute the main
"ARARs" for cleanup of FUSRAP wastes. In
particular, Option 1 of NRC's 1981 Branch Technical Position (see below), which
has been applied at many NRC-regulated sites around the nation, and NYS DEC's
TAGM-4003 are the CERCLA appropriate and relevant
criteria for cleanup of Tonawanda Site soils to unrestricted use levels.]
1.1 NRC Cleanup Criteria
NRC has developed or used the criteria in the following
references coupled with the concept of maintaining exposures from residual
radioactive material as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA) for guiding the
cleanup of contaminated soils, structures, and equipment for unrestricted use:
1. Guidelines for Decontamination of Facilities and
Equipment Prior to Release for Unrestricted Use or Termination of Licenses for
Byproduct, Source, and Special Nuclear Material, Policy and Guidance Directive
FC 83-23, November 4, 1983; Termination of Operating Licenses for Nuclear
Reactors, Regulatory Guide 1.86, June 1974 -- These two documents provide
criteria in terms of fixed and removable contamination and acceptable radiation
exposures associated with beta- and gamma-emitting surface contamination. The
FC 83-23 guidance also provides acceptable volumetric concentrations of
uranium, thorium, americium and plutonium in soil. The uranium and thorium
criteria are identical to the option 1 position in the Branch Technical
Position described in item 2. Regulatory Guide 1.86 has been combined with a 5
microR/hr at 1 meter external dose criterion for 60Co, 137Cs, and 152Eu that
may exist in concrete, components, and structures at nuclear reactor research
facilities, with an overall dose objective of 10 millirem/year (cf. Letter to
Stanford University from James R. Miller, Chief, Standardization and Special
Projects Branch, Division of Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, April 21, 1982, Docket No.
50-141).
2. Disposal or Onsite Storage of Thorium and Uranium Wastes
from Past Operations, Branch Technical Position, October 23, 1981, 46 FR 52061
-- This document provides acceptable activity concentrations of uranium and
thorium (with and without decay products) in soil under a variety of
conditions.
3. The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Interim
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, 40 CFR Part 141, July 9, 1976, 41
FR 38404 -- This EPA regulation provides maximum contaminant limits for
radionuclides in public drinking water, which can be extended to apply as
acceptable activity concentrations in groundwater and surface water (see FC
83-23). Drinking water standards have been established for radium-226/228,
gross-alpha particle emissions, and man-made radionuclides emitting beta
particles and photons. The Environmental Protection Agency recently (July 18,
1991) proposed adding standards for uranium and radon and revising the existing
standards for radium and gross-alpha (56 FR 33050).
4. The EPA's Persons Exposed to Transuranium Elements in the
Environment, November 30, 1977, 42 FR 60956 -- This document provides draft
radiation dose guidelines recommended by EPA for acceptable levels of
transuranium elements contamination in soil.
1.2 Doses Associated with Existing NRC Criteria
NMSS Policy and Guidance Directive FC
83-23
NMSS Policy and Guidance Directive FC 83-23 provides guidelines
for acceptable average and maximum surface contamination levels for a wide
variety of radionuclides. It also provides average and maximum radiation levels
of 0.2 and 1.0 millirad per hour at 1 centimeter for beta- and gamma-emitters.
In addition, the Directive provides an acceptable external radiation exposure
rate for soil contamination of 10 microRoentgen above background per hour at 1
meter. An enclosure to the Directive lists acceptable soil contamination levels
based on the 1981 Branch Technical Position and includes concentration values
for plutonium and americium compounds. For byproduct materials, the Directive
states that acceptable soil concentration levels will be determined on a
case-by-case basis. The criteria in FC 83-23 and their associated doses are
summarized in Table 1. The right hand column indicates "dose bases" calculated
using the computer code RESRAD that contains contemporary dosimetry and
exposure assumptions.
Regulatory Guide 1.86
NRC issued Regulatory Guide 1.86 in 1974. This guide provides
the same basis for the acceptable surface contamination levels described in
Policy and Guidance Directive FC 83-23. When combined with an exposure rate
limit of 5 microR/hr above background at 1 meter, this guide has been used in
decommissioning and terminating licenses for a number of research reactors. The
5 microR/hr criterion for indoor contamination corresponds to an annual whole
body dose of about 10 millirem for an assumed indoor occupancy period of 2000
hours per year. The 5 microR/hr criterion has been applied to 60Co, 137Cs, and
152Eu that may exist in concrete, components, and structures at nuclear reactor
research facilities, with an overall dose objective of 10 millirem/year (cf.
Letter to Stanford University from James R. Miller, Chief, Standardization and
Special Projects Branch, Division of Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, April 21, 1982, Docket No.
50-141).
Table 1. Acceptable Contamination Criteria and Associated Dose
Bases in NMSS Policy and Guidance Directive FC 83-23
Stated Estimated
Dose Dose Basis
Contamination Criterion Basis+ (EDE)+
Average, fixed 5000 dpm/100 cm2 None ~13mrem/yr
U-nat, 235U, 238U,
and decay products
Average, fixed 100 dpm/100 cm2 None ~0.2mrem/yr#
226Ra, 228Ra,
transuranics, etc.
Average, fixed 1000 dpm/100 cm2 None ~28 mrem/yr#
Th-nat, 232Th,
90Sr, etc.
Avg. and max. 0.2-1 mrad/hr None ~20 mrem/yr
external at 1 cm
beta-gamma dose
U-nat with decay 10 pCi/gm ~500 mrem/yr ~2.4 to 260
products in soil (based on mrem/yr
5 pCi 226Ra ~1.8 to 49
[Tonawanda soils] per gram mrem/yr@
standard in
40 CFR 192;
lifetime risk
of 0.02)
Depleted Uranium 35 pCi/gm 1 mrad/yr ~2.4 to 8
in soil (lung) mrem/yr@
3 mrad/yr ~1.8 to 18
(bone) mrem/yr@
Th-nat with decay 10 pCi/gm 35 mrem/yr ~35 to 82
products in soil mrem/yr@
Enriched Uranium 30 pCi/gm 1 mrad/yr ~2.4 to 5
in soil (lung) mrem/yr@
3 mrad/yr ~1.8 to 16
(bone) mrem/yr@
239Pu in soil 25 pCi/gm None ~15mrem/yr@
241Am in soil 30 pCi/gm None ~19 to 325
mrem/yr
External radiation 10 æR/hr at None ~24mrem/yr
1 meter above
background
+. Dose bases generally expressed in terms of potential dose to the
maximum reasonably exposed individual.
#. Calculated using draft NUREG/CR-5512. FC 83-23 criteria are based
more on technological capabilities (i.e., levels of detectability)
than on an explicit dose basis.
*. Estimate based on dose at 1 meter for 2000 hour occupancy.
@. Lower estimate represents conversion or repetition of stated dose
basis, while upper estimate based on RESRAD calculation (default
values used for input parameters).
&. Based on RESRAD calculations without and with water pathways
considered, respectively.
^. Estimate based on effective, unshielded occupancy of about 2360
hours for outside exposure.
|
Branch Technical Position (BTP) on Disposal or Storage
of Thorium and Uranium Wastes
On October 20, 1981, NRC published this technical position (46
FR 52061) to provide guidance on decommissioning and cleanup of fuel cycle and
other facilities contaminated with relatively large volumes of wastes with low
activity concentrations of uranium and thorium. In combination with the
disposal provisions in 10 CFR 20.302, the technical position provides four
"options" for disposal of uranium and thorium wastes, which vary in activity
concentration and corresponding potential radiological dose. As directed in the
Commission's April 6, 1992, staff requirements memorandum, only the
lower-activity concentration limits and disposal methods provided in Options 1
and 2 of the technical position can be applied as criteria for the release of a
site for unrestricted use. Options 3 and 4 require deed restrictions that would
be inconsistent with the Commission's regulations that require sites to be
cleaned up so that they may be released for unrestricted use.
Under Option 1 of the Branch Technical Position, licensees may
dispose of wastes containing natural thorium, depleted or enriched uranium, and
natural uranium without restrictions for burial method or post-termination land
use. The activity concentrations for this option are consistent with the levels
identified in Policy and Guidance Directive FC 83-23. The maximum activity
concentration for natural uranium is based on EPA standards for cleanup and
stabilization of uranium mill tailings for 226Ra (5 pCi/g) including its decay
products (42 FR 2556-2563). The activity concentrations for natural thorium and
depleted or enriched uranium are based on internal radiation dose guidelines
recommended by EPA for protection against transuranium elements present in the
environment as a result of unplanned contamination (42 FR 60956-60959). As
shown in Table 1, above, committed doses were expected to be on the order of
one millirad per year to the lung or three millirad per year to the bone from
inhalation and ingestion. The resulting concentrations would also limit
external exposures to less than 10 microroentgens per hour above background.
Under Option 2 of the 1981 BTP, concentrations of natural
thorium and depleted or enriched uranium are required to be buried under
prescribed conditions without requiring land use restrictions after license
termination. Disposals performed under Option 2 guidelines must be covered by
four feet or more of clean soil. Acceptable activity concentrations for burial
were calculated based on the criteria that (1) radiation doses to members of
the public should not exceed Option 1 levels when the waste is buried in an
approved manner under routine exposure conditions, and (2) radiation doses to
an inadvertent intruder should not exceed 170 millirems to a critical organ or
whole body.
When applying Option 2 of the technical position, the staff
evaluates the human intruder pathway. In addition, consistent with the
technical position, groundwater considerations are also evaluated, when
necessary, because of site specific hydrogeologic features and groundwater use.
Dose from the ground water pathway should not exceed 3 mrad/yr to the bone
(approximately 1.8 mrem/yr committed EDE) consistent with the stated dose basis
for the Option 1 concentration values. Dose from the human intruder pathway
should not exceed 170 mrem/yr to the critical organ. For soluble uranium, the
critical organ is the bone. For insoluble uranium, the critical organ is the
lung. For thorium, both soluble and insoluble, the critical organ is the whole
body.
The dose of 170 mrem/yr to the whole body, from Option 2
concentrations of thorium, via the human intruder pathway, may be unacceptably
high. Further, this 170 mrem/yr whole body dose assumes a 0.8 occupancy factor
and a 0.5 shielding factor. If the occupancy and shielding factors are set to
1, the dose from thorium may be as high as 420 mrem/yr to the whole body.
Therefore, for thorium concentrations above the Option 1 limit, the 10 CFR 20
limit of 100 mrem/yr TEDE may be the appropriate unrestricted-use release
limit. The intruder exposure pathway could possibly be ignored when the
disposal method makes the chance of future human access very remote, such as
via deep disposal, or disposal by mine backfill.
Disposals under Option 2 that involve depleted or enriched
uranium, are evaluated for buildup of decay products for a period of 1000
years. The original dose assessments to determine the Option 2 limits for
depleted and enriched uranium did not include decay products because the decay
products are removed in processing the uranium. Significant ingrowth of the
decay products requires more than one thousand years and has not been routinely
considered in assessing the acceptability of the disposals under Option 2 even
though potential doses may increase considerably with time (i.e., beyond 10,000
years).
Table 2 lists the Option 2 concentrations along with their
stated dose bases and estimated current dose bases calculated using the RESRAD
computer code that contains contemporary dosimetry and exposure assumptions. It
should be noted that the use of RESRAD and its default parameter assumptions
may not be appropriate for specific regulatory decisions depending on site
conditions and characteristics, which may render RESRAD estimates too
conservative or nonconservative.
Table 2. Concentrations and Dose Bases for Option 2 of the 1981
Branch Technical Position (BTP).
Stated Estimated
Dose Dose Basis
Contamination Criterion Basis (EDE)
Natural Thorium 50 pCi/gm 170 mrem/yr 170 - 420
mrem/yr
Depleted Uranium 100 pCi/gm 170 mrem/yr 5 - 50
(soluble) (bone) mrem/yr
300 pCi/gm 170 mrem/yr 20 - 68
(insoluble) (lung) mrem/yr
Enriched Uranium 100 pCi/gm 170 mrem/yr 5 - 52
(soluble) (bone) mrem/yr
250 pCi/gm 170 mrem/yr 20 - 42
(insoluble) (lung) mrem/yr
|
EPA's National Primary Drinking Water Standards for
Radionuclides
NRC staff has applied EPA's National Primary Drinking Water
Standards on a case-by-case basis to the cleanup and decommissioning of
contaminated sites to ensure adequate protection of groundwater and surface
water resources. These standards could be applied as criteria for limiting
radiation exposures via the ingestion pathway. This approach is explicitly
recognized in NMSS Policy and Guidance Directive FC 83-23. EPA promulgated
interim drinking water standards for radionuclides in 1976 at 40 CFR 141.15 and
141.16 for combined 226Ra/228Ra (5 pCi/l), gross-alpha particle activity (15
pCi/l, excluding radon and uranium), and beta particle and photon emitters (4
mrem/yr for "man-made" radionuclides). The standards are applicable to public
drinking water systems and are enforced at the tap. Although they are not
strictly applicable to the protection of groundwater and surface water
resources, NRC and other agencies (including EPA and States) have applied these
standards as objectives and guides for water resource protection. This
extension of the applicability of the drinking water standards has been
justified based on the paucity of other suitable criteria for water resource
protection and on the health and technological feasibility basis of the
drinking water standards. This approach is also consistent with EPA policy for
groundwater protection. In recent years, EPA has actually adopted the drinking
water standards for groundwater and surface water protection purposes at
uranium mill tailings sites (40 CFR Part 192, Subparts D and E and proposed
Subparts A - C). The dose associated with the standard for beta and photon
emitters is 4 mrem/yr. Assuming ingestion of 2 liters of drinking water per day
over a 50-year period, the dose associated with the 5 pCi/l standard for 226Ra
would be about 5 mrem/yr using the dose conversion factors provided in EPA's
Federal Guidance Report No. 11. It is difficult to convert the 15 pCi/l
standard for gross- alpha particle activity to dose because gross-alpha is a
screening parameter for a variety of alpha-emitting radionuclides and the dose
is a function of the energy and characteristics of the alpha decay and
biological parameters for each radionuclide.
On July 18, 1991, EPA proposed an increase in the drinking water
standard for radium from 5 pCi/l combined 226Ra/228Ra to 20 pCi/l for each
radionuclide (56 FR 33050). EPA has also proposed in the same rulemaking new
drinking water standards for uranium (20 ug/l or 30 pCi/l) and for radon-222
(300 pCi/l). The values of the beta/photon and gross-alpha standards would
remain the same, except that the gross-alpha standard would now exclude alpha
activity contributed by radium-226. NRC's October 16, 1991 comments to EPA on
the proposed rulemaking raised significant concerns about the proposed
revisions to the drinking water standards, including ambiguity associated with
the documented risk and radiological dose assessments that support the proposed
drinking water standards; the need for EPA to assess indirect impacts of the
new drinking water standards caused by their applications to other program
areas (e.g., decommissioning and waste management); and the need for guidance
on how to apply the uranium standard in situations where the uranium has been
depleted or enriched. Consequently, there is considerable uncertainity
associated with the content of the proposed drinking water standards.
|